The Coconut canteen; Ritters not so tropical canteen

Frederik Suijkerbuijk, 25 July 2022

A selection of different variants of coconut canteens


The so called coconut canteen or Kokosnuss can be observed with markings as early as 1941 indicating its first year of production. These canteens are often referred to as being tropical issue because of their webbing straps as used for other tropical issue equipment. The truth is that even though they first came out around the time the Afrikakorps ventured to Italian held Libya; these were probably not intended for sole tropical use. These canteens have mostly been mislabeled being tropical; therefore I try to explain the matter and the mystery about the Coconut canteen. Having collected and inspected numerous examples it is clear that most if not all canteens are slightly different. These are very collectible in their own right and caution should be taken; collecting these can be very addicting.

The material

The base of the canteen is a standard Model 1931 flask, encapsulated in a layer of wood paste covered with pressed wood slices or veneer and resin. This so to say ‘cover’ was meant as a insulator and to offer more resistance to wear then the its standard felt counterpart. The wood veneer is cheap to produce, strong and lasts for a long time; ground dug examples are often in good shape whereas items found around it have long perished. The coconut is not made out of bakelite which is, like wood veneer, a variant on resin; but with a totally different chemical composition.

One can see the several stacked layers orienting every other layer 90°, the individual layers are as thick as a piece of paper.
3 layers of wood on top of a hand applied insulating layer of wood pulp can be seen and counted creating a thick laminate around the flask
1. The aluminum flask body
2. The wood pulp paste applied prior to laminating
3. 3 layers of wood veneer
4. The bottle neck thread
5. The top of the neck and its rounded off aluminum layer.
M1910 Messkit marked Ritter Aluminium

The manufacturer

The coconut canteen was patented by the firm of Heinrich Ritter from Esslingen am Neckar, who had a large firm called Ritter Aluminium producing kitchenware. It was originally founded in 1911 and was one of the first factories to work with the then new material Aluminum. In the 1930’s they specialized in ships kitchenware but soon expanded to military equipment. It was one of the major producers for canteens and messkits for the German army.

Ritter produced many canteens and mess kits during the war. They made the M31 canteen between 1935 and 1943 after which they fully switched to the coconut canteens. They never made the M42 canteen in steel yet they did make steel cups for the coconut. They made the M31 mess kit from 1935 and 1945 without pause.

The Patent

The Patent by Heinrich Ritter Aluminumwerke

Heinrich Ritter, Aluminiumwarenfabrik, Esslingen/Neckar applied for the patent 15th of March 1940. The patent remained the ownership until 1953 when it was applied for again and acknowledged in 1954. The patent describes a metallic bottle which is encapsulated within a artificial resin or Pressstoff with wood veneer. These layers strengthens and insulates with warmth retaining properties for the contents. This patent refers to use with canteens, milk canisters and food carriers. So far we only see the use with canteens. The invention has the task of retaining heat rather then cooling.

Years of production

Although the patent was registered the 15th of March 1940, the coconut canteen was officially produced and issued between 1941 and 1945. The flasks themselves can be found dated 1941, 1942, 1943 and 1945. There is no example dated 1944 although we can see components which are dated to that year. There are hooks and friction buckles dated 1944 mostly come on 1943 and 1945 dated flasks. This is a indication that either in 1944 production was halted; or that they simply used 1943’s press molds. I have not seen any solid proof proving that production either continued in 1944 nor that it was halted. We just know there are no 1944 dated flasks known in collections as of now.

Untouched 1943 dated coconuts can be often found with HRE45 marked cups. This indicates that the line of production probably stopped in 1943 and was picked up again in 1945.

Interesting enough; we can find cups, hooks and friction buckles dated 1944; but no flasks. There are several theories that all are plausible yet we don’t have any proof for either.

– The factory overproduced in 1943, finishing their product as late as 1945
– The factory was bombed out in 1943
– The army didn’t like the canteen or it was too expensive to produce and later reinstated it again because of equipment shortages.

Flask markings

The flask itself is marked on the convex side with the following codes;

D.R.G.M. – The patent Deutsches Reichsgebrauchsmuster, meaning its design and use was registered and protected. This is not a patent although the Germans often referred to this being the ‘Kleines Reichspatent’.
H.R.E. 41 – the producer Heinrich Ritter, Esslingen 1941
D.R.P. angm.
Deutsches Reichspatent Angemeldet; meaning it was applied for the German Reichspatent office protecting its design and use.
Letter or number; this is a code for the mold of the product also seen on phenolic resin or bakelite items. This code could identify from the finished product when a mold needed maintenance or replacement. In short terms; when a batch of coconuts was inspected they would look for damages in the wood that occurred during production. With the mold markings; one could instantly see which mold needed fixing or replacement. This is a feature on most if not all bakelite or molded Pressstoff items.

HRE42 marked coconut; under D.R.P. angm. the marking K can be observed; this is probably a mold or batch code. This marking in letters would later be replaced with numbers in 1943.
HRE42 marked coconut; under D.R.P. angm. the marking V can be observed; this is probably a mold or batch code. This marking in letters would later be replaced with numbers in 1943.
HRE43 marked coconut; under D.R.P. angm. the marking 23 can be observed; this is probably a mold or batch code.
HRE43 marked coconut; under D.R.P. angm. the marking 38 can be observed; this is probably a mold or batch code.
HRE45 marked coconut; under D.R.P. angm. the marking 1 can be observed; this is probably a mold or batch code. The highest I have observed was 13

The Afrikakorps connection

The coconut canteen is said to been designed specifically for the Afrikakorps; but is its design logical, let alone usable in a tropical climate? When we look at the canteen it is obvious that the pressed veneer covering the flask has a very dark colour; making it not the ideal colour to keep out heat in the sun let alone in tropical climates such as north africa. The thick wood veneer is otherwise a great insulator retaining the temperature inside as well as the felt cover does. A well known period newsreel showing Afrikakorps Panzer men cooking eggs on a mere black surface on their Panzer II without a heater is a clear indicator that having dark colours in a climate like that is definitely not a good idea.

I tested two canteens; one ‘tropical’ 1 Liter Labeflasche with felt cover and a Coconut canteen. Both filled with water and casually placed in a sunny environment with 38 degrees Celsius. After one hour the results were interesting; the ‘tropical’ Labeflasche was exactly the air temperature of 38,9 degrees Celius with the contents warm but drinkable. The coconut canteen on the other hand was 49,9 degrees Celsius with its content too hot to consume. My choice in the tropical heat? Quite obvious.

The standard ‘tropical’ canteen with felt cover was 38,9 degrees Celsius
The ‘tropical’ coconut canteen with felt cover was 48,9 degrees Celsius

Having looked at tons of images we can not find a single image of a coconut canteen in use with the Afrikakorps. The closest shot we get is a set of prisoners of war riding a train in the United States showing a first pattern coconut with square tips. In my opinion; if it did make it to Africa, it was probably in small numbers in its initial field trials and most probably in its earliest shape with square metal tips which can be observed in the photo below.

POW’s riding a train in the United States; source

The connection to the tropical equipment is the assumption that all equipment manufactured with webbing instead of leather is instantly a tropical issue item but there are many equipment items with webbing or canvas which are not specifically tropical. Allthough we can not prove it was not a specifically tropical item can not disprove it either; it just makes no sense filing in a patent for something that was irrelevant early 1940.

The coconut canteen disassembled

Two main models

There are two main variants that one can identify. The earliest examples carried a unmarked square metal tip The variation is mainly in the closing strap. One being a Ritter patent friction buckle, the other being a simplified roller-buckle. I have seen the roller buckles on canteens as early as 1942, but never before. The specific friction buckle is also made and patented by Ritter and can be seen on the earliest coconut canteens.
I choose to remain with these two main variants to keep things clear. The cup, the material of the straps and hardware varies too much whilst there are just two types of closure buckles. I will deal with small variating differences later in this article.

Type 1 coconut canteen with friction buckle and square metal tip, this is in my opinion the earliest pattern prior to the utilization of SHB and LUX tips
Type 1 coconut canteen with friction buckle on the main strap with pointed SHB marked metal tip
Type 2 coconut canteen with roller buckle on the main strap with pointed SHB marked metal tip


There are many, maybe uncountable variations that make collecting interesting. These variations are mostly attributed to fabrics and cups which are so diverse that there is always a new variant to discover that is different in a way. Most of these variations are subtle and small; hardly noticeable for the novice collector. A lot of the variations can be seen in the material utilized for the straps. The tan webbing turned into a mix of several colors and later several materials around 1943.

Type 1 coconut canteen with it’s horizontal strap made out of artificial leather or Pressstoff
Type 1 coconut canteen with a typical HRE made aluminum cup with sharp edge dated 1943
Type 2 coconut canteen marked HRE43 with a typical HRE made aluminum cup with sharp edge dated 1945. It is typical to find this factory issued(!) 1943 and 1945 combination.

Type 1 friction buckle

Type 1 friction buckle with plain strap and steel retainer loop
Type 1 friction buckle with variant strap; this strap was made with holes for the roller buckle
Type 2 roller buckle with metal eyelets and steel retainer loop
Type 2 roller buckle with metal eyelets and leather retainer loop
Type 2 roller buckle with machine sewn holes and metal retainer loop

Although countless variants exist here are 6 different variants of main strap material. All are different and my assumption is that the Ritter factory worked with subcontractors and or used whatever was available to construct the straps. On these photos you can also see the pencil markings for the sewing indicating the placing of certain elements.

The Harness in details

Securing the strap to the breadbag or securing the cup to the flask meant a piece of webbing was looped trough a buckle and pushed through a retaining loop. Without some sort of modification this would mean a short lifespan to the webbing which would easily fray and require repairs. The Germans used a wide variety of metal or leather points to stop fraying of webbing equipment. Generally, there are two types as used on the Coconut canteen and we can identify at least two different manufacturers. We can find unmarked examples or marked LUX or SBH. I have not encountered any other maker markings on these canteen points having studied 100 canteens.

First pattern metal folded clip

This simple folded metal clip is only seen on 1941 and 1942 dated coconut canteens. It is a simple but effective point to stop the fraying of the webbing. Considering we see this only on the early canteens we can assume this is a early production by the Ritter factory prior utilizing SHB or LUX tips en masse and shifting to the well known triangular shaped metal tip.

SHB metal points in blue paint
SHB metal points in galvanised finish
Lux metal points in painted finish
Unmarked Lux metal points in painted finish

The SBH and Lux marked tips look alike; but they are not the same. The SHB marked tips are made from a single sheet of metal whilst the LUX marked examples are made out of two separate pieces. In this way; we can identify the maker of the unmarked example shown above. The most common metal tip to find is marked SHB, the LUX marked examples are less common. I have found painted and galvanized examples. I have not found any other markings on the metal tips having studied 100 coconut canteens.

examples as found on coconut canteens

In general there were 4 types of caps as used on the coconut canteen with one example specifically made for the coconut canteen; it is not encountered on any other canteen and it is made from the same material as the canteens itself. Please note; the brown leather strap on the first canteen cap shown is a replacement.

From left to right;
1. Aluminum Modell 1931 canteen cap marked HRE43
2. Second pattern black resin canteen cap as used post 1942.
3. Specific canteen cap for the Coconut canteen
4. First pattern black resin canteen cap

The harness is secured onto the flask by means of a leather strap around the neck. This leather strap is made out of pigskin leather and is secured with a black painted roller buckle. The straps can be marked and dated HRE, JSD, WIKO or REP. It is sewn on the inside of the canteen and looped through a piece of harness at the outside of the canteen.

The clasp sewn onto the canteen harness can be mounted in several ways. The clasps are not always marked but most are marked Patent Ritter and or HRE inside the clasp. These clasps are galvanized or painted in grey, green, blue or red.

Cups for the Coconut canteen

There are generally four types of cups to encounter on these canteens as fitted from the factory. These are all typical for this type of canteen and as far as I am aware I don’t know of other types issued with the coconut. There of course always exceptions but I choose to focus on the cups that were issued with the coconut from the factory only.

1. Sharp edged aluminum drinking cup, painted or unpainted.

These were made specifically for the coconut canteen. The model was first produced pre war for the 1 Liter medical canteen or Labeflasche. These early examples have a rolled edge. The examples seen on the coconut are less well finished with a sharp raw edge. These can be found in Olive paint or with no paint at all. These can be found unmarked or marked HRE with a manufacturing date. These cups are made right up to 1945. Although there are other manufacturers producing the caps post 1940, the HRE marked examples above, and unmarked examples are typical for the coconut canteen.

2. Modell 31 Aluminum drinking cup with handles.

A typical Aluminum Modell 31 drinking cup in Olive paint. These can be found with steel and aluminum handles.

3. Modell 42 Steel drinking cup with handles

The steel M42 canteen cups can be easily recognized to the shape of the dent in the side of the attachment hinge which is typical for cups made by Ritter and can not be observed at other canteen makers. Compare these to another canteen cup and you will see the different shape on the left hand side of the handle attachment plate. These cups can be seen in olive, brown and red paint. Typically these cups were primed in red oxide and oversprayed externally with olive paint. But there are numerous variations in paint schemes.

– Red inside, green outside
– Green inside and outside
– Red inside and outside
– all of the above can be seen marked or unmarked

4. Phenolic resin drinking cup

Phenolic Resin drinking cup in black and speckled brown colour

These cups are often referred to as being bakelite like the coconut canteen itself; the material used for these cups is a phenolic resins with a variety of fillers creating their unique appearance . There are many colour varieties to be found yet the most common and in my opinion factory fitted examples are always black or brown on the coconut canteens. Unlike other parts of the canteen, I have not found any proof that these cups were made by Ritter so in my opinion they were made by a external manufacturer.

Postwar examples

The coconut canteen was reintroduced post war in the 1950’s and retained the same design at first. The post war models can easily be recognized by the Alfurit markings on the flask or the absence of markings on the cup. There are also postwar canteens marked HRE with postwar dates such as ; HRE 57. The early postwar harnesses are exactly the same as their wartime counterparts with sometimes the same mis match construction which indicates they still had a bunch of wartime parts or harnesses themselves in stock. At some point the harness construction switched to black and brown leather and later in green leather. The post war canteens are also marked DRP. A. because the patent was introduced in the third reich era. These patents were last given out in 1949 and can be seen up until 1952 because the German patents protected for 3 years! Canteens marked Ritter Alfurit D.R.P.a. are presumed to be postwar.

Post war Ritter Alfurit marked coconut manufactured for the BGS


The coconut canteen produced by Heinrich Ritter Aluminiumwarenfabrik was not produced specifically for the Afrikakorps as believed. It was invented pre World War Two as a heat insulating layer. It most probably did better in the eastern cold then it did in the heat of Africa. Although there are little to none proofs that the coconut canteen made it to Africa and if so, in small numbers. On the other hand; there are many coconuts to be observed photographed on the eastern front. This indicates that it was either too late or probably not well suited for the hot climate. The truth is that there is no connection with these canteens and tropical equipment. Their design makes them look like a coconut, but that’s the same comparison as that the Tornister or ‘Affe‘ should be made for monkeys.

Thanks to; Otto, Luuk, Andreas, Dirk, Chris and Olaf